Protect existing nuclear! Build more nuclear! Develop advanced nuclear! ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿผโš›


Showing 12 reactions

How would you tag this suggestion?
Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • commented 2016-09-23 16:56:47 -0400
    Hi โ€” thanks for your feedback! To better facilitate discussion, weโ€™ve moved all comments from this page to a new and improved forum. Please join us here to see all responses and leave any further feedback: https://forum.climatemobilization.org/topic/12/we-need-more-nuclear-energy
  • commented 2016-09-07 14:02:12 -0400
    I completely agree with the detailed account posted by Anonymous.
  • tagged this with disagree 2016-09-07 14:02:11 -0400
  • tagged this with disagree 2016-09-02 15:37:57 -0400
  • commented 2016-09-01 23:28:40 -0400
    I do not believe Prof Mark Jacobson’s (Stanford-The world can be powered by alternative energy, using todayโ€™s technology, in 20-40 years, says Stanford researcher Mark Z. Jacobson, 2014&15) plan needed nuclear. James Hansen felt it might be needed especially for China.* But do we not buy ourselves another potential for disaster by including it. There are cross-over problems with nuclear weapons and terrorism, and with unsolved storage problems. NPPlants much like Fukushima already exist and they need safety-strenthening; We must think hard before building more. Dorothy Knable, MS in a social-sience, with a year of recent global warming studies through Earth Institute, Columbia; Prof Jeff D Sachs and Johan Rockstrom, Stockholm U.
  • tagged this with disagree 2016-09-01 23:28:39 -0400
  • tagged this with disagree 2016-08-25 01:36:47 -0400
  • commented 2016-08-24 22:03:47 -0400
    We have far exceeded the carbon balance of the biosphere. Ocean acidification and climate disruption are the result. Merely reducing energy usage and carbon emissions is not adequate. We must make a concerted effort to completely decarbonize our global energy supply, not just in the electricity sector, but also in other sectors of energy use, such as transportation and industrial process. Nuclear is the only technology capable of rapid and massive scaling, application to non-electric sectors, and zero carbon emissions. Nuclear power is the critical control point we must address if we are to have success moving forward as a viable species and society on the planet.
  • tagged this with agree 2016-08-24 21:53:04 -0400
  • commented 2016-08-24 19:10:12 -0400
    If we take climate change seriously, and rank it as one of the most serious threats to human civilization, then we have to deploy nuclear power, along with other low-carbon technologies. An energy system based on nuclear, hydro, geothermal, wind, and solar power would be able to provide all of our electricity and liquid fuel needs.
  • tagged this with agree 2016-08-24 19:10:11 -0400
  • published this page in Victory Plan 2016-08-24 13:11:49 -0400