Mobilizers Denounce Climate Agreement as “Historic” Failure at United Nations Signing Ceremony

By Ezra Silk and Margaret Klein Salamon

NEW YORK – As establishment civil society groups and politicians gathered Friday morning to cheer the signing of the Paris Agreement as an “historic” achievement that will avert global catastrophe, a group of climate emergency protesters staged a “mass death” and collapse scenario outside the United Nations to demonstrate the reality of the future the agreement locks in.

20160422_100535.jpg

The protesters acted out the collapse of global civilization that will occur if humanity remains on the Paris Agreement’s non-binding emissions trajectory toward a world 3.5°C hotter than the pre-industrial period.

More specifically, they enacted the mass starvations the agreement’s emissions trajectory would allow, erecting grave stones for the nation-states that will collapse under the stress of extreme drought and water scarcity, and playing the government and civil society bureaucrats who pretend that the situation is under control and that business-as-usual reforms can protect humanity and the natural world.

Speakers included The Climate Mobilization’s founders Margaret Klein Salamon and Ezra Silk, as well as Mark Dunlea, a leader of the Green Education and Legal Fund. All of the speakers called for an emergency, World War II-scale mobilization that eliminates global net greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 and restores a safe and stable climate by drawing down all excess carbon dioxide and cooling the planet from the dangerously high temperatures reached in recent months and years. To hear these speeches, see our 33 minute video.

“This die in represents the direction humanity is careening towards — the direction the Paris agreements will take us,” Klein Salamon said. “But, critically, we still have a chance to avert catastrophe. We can rapidly transition our economy to meet an existential threat. We did it in World War II, and we can do it again. All we need is the political will, especially the citizens who dedicate themselves to making it a reality, and we can restore a safe and stable climate.”  

 

Toothless_NGO_pic.jpg

Killed_by_State_Failure_Pic.jpg

The Paris Agreement calls for net zero greenhouse gas emissions at some point “in the second half of this century,” and does not directly cover aviation, shipping, or agriculture, which collectively account for, at minimum, between a quarter and a third of global greenhouse gas emissions. In the first three months of 2016, global average temperature anomalies approached and surpassed the limits called for in the Agreement, rendering its gradual emissions trajectory irrelevant and dangerous.

 

DieIn8.jpg

“The Paris Agreement is historic in the sense that the Munich Agreement was historic – a catastrophic act of appeasement meant to maintain business-as-usual arrangements,” said Silk. “Leading economists argue that climate change could cause at least as much destruction as World War II – and the non-binding Paris Agreement paves the way for that future. It’s time to stop waiting for another climate ‘Pearl Harbor,’ and to mobilize all available resources to save human civilization.”

20160422_095721.jpgThe Climate Mobilization sponsored the event with the support of the People’s Climate Movement New York. Since last fall, The Climate Mobilization has pressured all Democratic and Republican presidential contenders to endorse a WWII-scale mobilization to restore a safe climate. Last week, Bernie Sanders embraced the idea at the CNN debate held at the Brooklyn Navy Yard, which played a pivotal role in the World War II home front mobilization of the 1940s.

“Of course the [Paris] agreement is a step forward, but you know agreements and I know agreements, there's a lot of paper there,” Sanders said. “If we approach this, Errol, as if we were literally at a war -- you know, in 1941, under Franklin Delano Roosevelt, we moved within three years, within three years to rebuild our economy to defeat Nazism and Japanese imperialism. That is exactly the kind of approach we need right now.” 

 DieIn1.jpg

The protest, and TCM's argument for it, received excellent press coverage, including in The New RepublicUnited Press International, EcoWatch, and Thom Hartmann.

For the scientific basis behind the critique of the Paris Agreement, see Climate Mobilization advisor David Spratt’s groundbreaking report “Climate Reality Check."

 

20160422_104140.jpg

Showing 2 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • commented 2016-04-23 05:58:16 -0400
    Great page! Post it everywhere!!
  • commented 2016-04-22 22:56:26 -0400
    Hmm……"Killed by Gradualism". The Paris agreement “does not directly cover aviation, shipping, or agriculture….” What does the author mean by that? Wait, the writer of this article didn’t put his or her name on it. The truth can be a pretty frightening thing. Whatever your views on climate change, I think we can agree – the elephant is standing right there in the room.